![]() *If you're using another Antivirus just look for similar settings and set the Firewall Profile of the LAC Adapter/network to** Private**. that is what worked for me and now can send files faster. Try sending the failed file and it should work this time. OR Go to Network Profiles (click Settings under Current Network) and change the LAC network adapter Profile to Private. The Firewall Profile for the network will be set to Public. You will notice a new network that will appear below your connected Ethernet/WiFi network. you will see under*** recent apps Managed by your Firewal **l that * "SamsungFlowDeskto**p" app was blocked. in this case files are blocked for security reasons i guess.Ĭlick Protection > Firewall. On my PC (running Windows 10), my antivirus had settings for the network created through the Microsoft WiFi Direct Virtual Adapter to Public which meant there will be certain restrictions to what can be allowed to be send through the network (the way i interpret it) - mine is Local Area Connection *3 (Adapter). The Firewall settings on your antivirus could be the cause. ![]() I found a solution to a problem that makes sharing files between a PC and your Phone through the Samsung Flow app impossible. Other: If it doesn't fall in any of the other categories, post it here!.traffic bar at the top of the page shows route progress and traffic flow. Tricks: Neat tricks or if you discover something that you want to share Lets you know about accidents, construction, police, road closures and other.Discussion: for discussion about Samsung or Samsung's products.Rumor: for rumors about Samsung or Samsung's products.News: for news about Samsung or Samsung's products.Link flair must be used (this prevents spam) No Offensive, Harassing or Inflammatory Language.No tech-support or “what should I buy” questions.No self-promotion (including referral links/codes).No posts that aren't directly related to Samsung.Posts must foster reasonable discussion.So, one could conclude that Samsung should have known better – or at least given us a little more warning.Join the official r/Samsung Discord Rules It's convention in the ARM system-on-chip world to keep the I-cache lines the same widths within a package to avoid all of the above headaches: ARM certainly does in its Cortex-A designs (well, OK, it didn't with the A7 and A15, but there after.) However, the Cortex-A53, as used in Samsung's Exynos 8890, makes no mention of other cores having different widths in its tech manual. That implies that software engineers should be aware that the cache line width can vary across a device. Other processors, however, can feature caches that support cache line lengths different than those of the Cortex-A15 processor. The Cortex-A15 processor L1 caches contain 64-byte lines. The technical reference manual for the Cortex-A15, an early big.LITTLE core, notes: On the one hand, this isn't strictly Samsung's fault. One proper way out is to patch the operating system kernel so that reading the CPU's I-cache line width always returns the smallest size for the hardware, thus leaving no byte behind when swabbing out dead instructions. Mono's approach is at least resilient to this. Unfortunately, it's tricky to completely solve from userspace because fetching the I-cache width from the CPU and flushing the next line is not atomic: a thread could be rescheduled onto a core with a different cache line width during the loop in a way that would cause memory to be skipped. Mono does something similar now: it tries to work out the smallest instruction cache width in the device and just uses that. Software built by the LLVM compiler and Google's V8 JavaScript engine does not suffer as badly as GCC's generated code because it requests the CPU's I-cache width immediately before each increment. Mono, Dolphin and PPSSPP have patched their code to try to avoid the problem. That leaves stale code in the cache, which will confuse and crash the program. In reality, the smaller core will only clear out the first 64 bytes, and _clear_cache will skip the rest to the next 128-byte block. Now, if an app that was running on an M1 is moved to an A53, it will expect to clear out the instruction cache in 128-byte blocks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |